Page 1 of 3

getting new bits :roll:

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 17:29
by kAoS-aZZie
i am going shopping for a new vid card tomorrow :D

gonna get a geforce 6600 GT
NOT gonna get a radeon ::grrrrrr::
can get one for about $270 NZD

also going shopping for a new monitor (window shopping anyway)
gonna get a 21" like my present one
ffs this bloody LCD gear is crap, i hate the graphics and the colour it generates

then . . . .

but i digress . . .

what i really wanted to ask is what do others think about monitors?
what r ur thoughts on CRT/LCD?

i mean, LCD wud be easier for lanning
but . . .

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 18:10
by gämmö
CTR

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 18:26
by kAoS-Druzilla
LCD ::headbanger::



::l3373r::

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 18:46
by kAoS-Maian0
Well if you decide to go for an LCD, you should have a look through this article. Any one of these would be more then adequate. But dont go lower then an 19" LCD cause the latency's are far too high and will give horrible ghosting.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/04/do_the_new_19/

The article is a couple of months old however, but should still give you a good indication.

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 19:02
by kAoS-2k
Ask gammo for one ::haha::

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 19:33
by kAoS-Druzilla
kAoS-Maian0 wrote:But dont go lower then an 19" LCD cause the latency's are far too high and will give horrible ghosting.


Well thats a LIE! i have 17" LCD and it's fine no ghosting what so ever.

For gaming you want a lower response time mine is 8ms.

This is my monitor here http://www.sony.com.au/catalog/product. ... ryId=22009

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 19:41
by kAoS-Maian0
Well yours is 12ms, and latency and response are pretty much one in the same arent they? And sooooory, just everytime I hear about 17"ers its how bad they are in terms of latecny and ghosting and how much better off you are with a 19". Besides these days you can get a good 19" for relatively cheap prices and are always dropping.

CRT's are the better option for gaming cause theres no chance of ghosting, but they are just waaaaay to chunky...mines 17" and THATS bulky enough, I couldnt imagine a 21" :eek:

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 19:51
by gämmö
CTR

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 19:55
by kAoS-Maian0
Yer we get it gammo, CTR lol

=)

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 19:56
by kAoS-Rage
if you going to get a lcd get the 4ms one http://umart.net/au/product_info.php?cPath=46_204&products_id=102072&osCsid=9bb091015dbef1f330577aa69a4b504a
but if you got the space get a 22 inc like i got.
Diamond Pro 2070sb
http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/2956 ... 0417de.jpg

Posted: 13 Jan 2006 22:07
by kAoS-Druzilla
kAoS-Maian0 wrote:Well yours is 12ms, and latency and response are pretty much one in the same arent they? And sooooory, just everytime I hear about 17"ers its how bad they are in terms of latecny and ghosting and how much better off you are with a 19". Besides these days you can get a good 19" for relatively cheap prices and are always dropping.

CRT's are the better option for gaming cause theres no chance of ghosting, but they are just waaaaay to chunky...mines 17" and THATS bulky enough, I couldnt imagine a 21" :eek:


LINK IS FUCKED :cry: HAVE A LOOK AT THIS MODEL SDMHS75PS FFS I'M NOT BLIND, AND WHAT YOU SAY IS A LIE THERE IS NO GHOSTING ON 17" LCDS FFS

Posted: 14 Jan 2006 07:14
by kAoS-aZZie
space & mobility wise the LCD wud be great but i dunno
kinda not my thing . . . hate the graphics etc

i got the space for 21" or more
ffs i might link my comp to my tv & play off that
wOOt . . 42" rear screen projection!

i do have plenty monitors but this time i buying a NEW one
only ever had one brand new one before in my life

R@ge . . is ur's a flat screen?

just remembered . . . my cat sleeps on top my monitor
don't think she cud do that on a LCD :roll:

Posted: 14 Jan 2006 10:03
by kAoS-Druzilla
:arrow:

Posted: 14 Jan 2006 11:46
by gämmö
CTR

Posted: 14 Jan 2006 12:17
by kAoS-Druzilla
gämmö wrote:CTR


lol all this time you say it wrong its CRT ::rolf2::